RECORD OF SC PROCEEDINGS ON 26.11.18

1

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV

 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19799/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-04-2017

in WP No. 5868/2016 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

ALL INDIA INSURANCE PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT & 

ORS. Petitioner(s)

 VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 27963/2017 (XIV)

( IA No.70987/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT)

 SLP(C) No. 20929/2017 (XIV)

(and IA No. 14118/2017-clarification/Direction)

 SLP(C) No. 21206/2017 (XIV)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

 SLP(C) No. 30000/2017 (XIV)

(IA FOR APPLICATION FOR TAGGING/DETAGGING ON IA 144252/2018)

 SLP(C) No. 28873/2017 (XIV)

Date : 26-11-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : 

 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Mullapaudi Rambabu, Adv.

Mr. N.Eswara Rao, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Shanker, Adv.

Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Adv.

Ms. Vijayshree Pattnaik, Adv.

 M/S. M. Rambabu And Co., AOR

2

 Mr. Saurav Aggarwal, Adv.

Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Adv.

Mr. Gyan Prakash Srivastava, AOR

 Mr. V.Shekhar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. R.K.Singh, Adv.

Mr. Neeraj Singh, Adv.

Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv.

Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Adv.

Ms. Prithviraj Singh, Adv.

Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Aman Rastogi, Adv.

Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

 Mr. Ashish Garrg, Adv.

Mr. T. L. Garg, AOR

Mr. Rajiv K.Garg, Adv.

 Petitioner-in-person

 Mr. Jay Savla, AOR

Ms. Renuka Sahu, Adv.

Mr. Prabhat Chaurasia, Adv.

Mr. Jasdeep Singh dhillon, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vinay Ratnakar, Adv.

Mr. Anmol Tayal, Adv.

 Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR

 Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Alka Agrawal, Adv.

Mr. R.Balasubramanian, Adv.

Mr. S.K.Singhania, Adv.

Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR

 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

 O R D E R

According to learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Life Insurance Corporation, the order of the High court has been

complied with to the extent possible.

According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the

order of the High Court has not been fully complied with, and

objections to the affidavit of compliance have been filed with.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the LIC states

that he would like to file response to the objections. The

response may be filed within a period of three weeks from today.

3

List the matter for final disposal on a non-miscellaneous

day in the second week of February, 2019.

(SHASHI SAREEN) (KAILASH CHANDER)

 AR CUM PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR