Skip to main content

Posts

3 A

यत्र योगेष्वर कृष्ण , ..तत्र पार्थो धनुर्धर      It is all Ok. ...but...     My Lord !     To fight , one needs  to understand bows and arrows.     (  Let me have a look at it so that I may learn what they are. )    So give me  first the 3 A.        The Three Arrows I mean.              V ision, I nsight and , C onviction           ***************************************************************    ( I  just quote BHAGAWAT GITA. nothing else is intended.. ! - From Editor ) Your views and Suggestions to enhance quality of this blog are WELCOME The COMMENTS column is subject to MODERATION.

PLEASE STAND BY ....(VIEW AGAIN !)

Your views and Suggestions to enhance quality of this blog are WELCOME The COMMENTS column is subject to MODERATION.

PLEASE STAND BY

Your views and Suggestions to enhance quality of this blog are WELCOME The COMMENTS column is subject to MODERATION.

CIRCULAR ON ORGANISATIONAL MATTERS...FROM FEDERATION

FEDERATION OF RETIRED CLASS I OFFICERS' ASSOCIATIONS . PRESIDENT: N.P.BALI.                                                   GEN.SECRETARY'S OFFICE GEN.SECY.:   G.N.SRIDHARAN.                                   7/4  II CROSS ST.,                                                                                            KARPAGAM GARDENS,                                                                                                            ADYAR,CHENNAI 600020                                           CIRCULAR ON ORGANISATIONAL MATTERS. It will be recalled that we have been repeatedly advising all our affiliated Units that the annual general body meetings should be held during mare onths of April, May and June for the sake of uniformity in our accounting procedures.  We are therefore happy to know that at least nine associations including those in metro centres have already held their annual meeting during the year so far. We have therefore pleasure in shari

LIC HAS NOT SETTLED THE CORRECT AMOUNT TO SHRI MC.JAIN AND SIMILAR OTHERS.

Date:  21.6.2016 GN SRIDHARAN WRITES:    As already informed, we are constantly pursuing this issue with the Central Office.  A delegation led by our President Shri Bali had stressed the need for doing justice to the small group of affected pensioners (only Class I retirees ) . We would like to inform that as a follow up our Jt.Secy at Mumbai Shri D M Pathak ha s submitted a memorandum on our behalf on the subject to to the E.D. (Per) on 21/7/2016 reiterating that it is not fair to deny this small group the extension of the benefit arising out of the Jaipur HC judgement in MC Jain's case.   Copies of the same are being sent to the units who had sent to us in the past the list of their members falling under this category. Others are requested to send their list to us immediately.  We are aware that LIC has not settled the correct amount to Shri MC Jain himself as is being repeatedly pointed out by others.  Our members will appreciate that we are now on the job of g

A NEW LIGHT ON RETIRAL BENEFITS. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT DATED 18.5.2016

RETIRAL BENEFITS.  Dear Sri.Sridharan, I thank you for your email dated 5.5.2016 A few pensioners and I have decided to file a writ in Delhi High Court against the Bank listing out the irregularities it has committed ignoring,  a) the rights of the pensioners as per the SBI Employees' Pension Fund Rules,  b) the Supreme Court order issued to the Bank on 23.2.1989,   c) the observations in V.Kasturi vs SBI, d) its own Board resolution dated 26.7.2000 and f)several Supreme Court judgments, such as Nakara, U.P.Raghavendra  Acharya vs the State of Karnataka, the State of Jharkhand &ors vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava etc. . I  am also using the ruling delivered on 4.5.1971 by a Constitutional Banch of the Supreme Court  in Deokinandan Prasad vs the State of Bihar that Pension is a property and under Art 300A of the Constitution of India, none has the right to withhold the property with the authority of LAW. I have requested my advocate to ensure that t

GN SRIDHARAN SPEAKS.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ  ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT JUDGMENT ON 18.5.2016 YOU MAY ALSO  PLEASE CLICK HERE  In case readers may need any clarification on any news/views expressed, they are welcome to post their view point/question on which they need clarification, as a COMMENT.  Your comments  to enhance the quality of this blog are equally.  welcome.  

LATEST NEWS FROM GN SRIDHARAN

YOU ARE LISTENING TO A MESSAGE FROM SRI G N SRIDHARAN GENERAL SECRETARY OF FEDERATION OF LIC CLASS I RETIRED OFFICERS' ASSOCIATIONS. Seated by the side of Sri G.N.Sridharan is Sri M.Arunachalam, Vice President of Retired LIC Class I Officers Association, Chennai.

No clash with eminent legal experts

Why hype on a procedural matter !! When a new petition comes up before the court the first step as per procedural laws is for the court to order notice returnable on or before a specified date. When the Hyderabad  Petition was moved in the Delhi High court , the  court decided to tag it on to the three WPs remanded to it by the supreme court for which the hearing date was already fixed as 12/7/2016  As the counsels for the Respondents were readily available in the court they had taken notice on the spot and the court asked them to file their counter  within 3 weeks .  There is nothing extraordinary about this.I would therefore reiterate that I had stated only the correct procedure I had expected and that is what actually happened.  I wonder whether an average pensioner will be interested at all on such procedural niceties.  Any reporting on such matters so long as what the reporter states is not contradicted , can be clearly seen only as an action to create a hype among t

REFIXATION OF PENSION FOR RETIREES FROM AUG 92 TO AP 93

Re: Re- fixation of pensions for retirees of the p eriod 1/8/92 to 1/4/93.  We have been of late receiving several enquirers in regard to this issue and we assure that the same is being taken up with the Central Office at every opportunity. Even at the meeting our delegation led by our President Shri. Bali had with Dir (Per)  on 18/5/2016 the issue was discussed, and there has been no valid point made out by the management on why they cannot extend the benefit conferred by the Rajasthan HC in MC Jain's case. We would also like to keep going to court as the last option, not because the number of affected Class 1 pensioners is not large but because of the time involved in litigation. I spoke to Shri S Srivastav Dir (p)  on the subject again yesterday, and our office bearers at Mumbai M/S Nerurkat and Pathak will be following up the matter. Meantime we appeal to the concerned members to await the result of our current initiative after which we shall take a final call on approac