A NEW LIGHT ON RETIRAL BENEFITS. ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT DATED 18.5.2016

RETIRAL BENEFITS. 

Dear Sri.Sridharan,

I thank you for your email dated 5.5.2016

A few pensioners and I have decided to file a writ in Delhi High Court against the Bank listing out the irregularities it has committed ignoring, 

a) the rights of the pensioners as per the SBI Employees' Pension Fund Rules,

 b) the Supreme Court order issued to the Bank on 23.2.1989, 

 c) the observations in V.Kasturi vs SBI, d) its own Board resolution dated 26.7.2000 and f)several Supreme Court judgments, such as Nakara, U.P.Raghavendra  Acharya vs the State of Karnataka, the State of Jharkhand &ors vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava etc.

.I  am also using the ruling delivered on 4.5.1971 by a Constitutional Banch of the Supreme Court  in Deokinandan Prasad vs the State of Bihar that Pension is a property and under Art 300A of the Constitution of India, none has the right to withhold the property with the authority of LAW.

I have requested my advocate to ensure that the Central Government is kept above of the fray as it is in no way concerned with payment of pension by SBI to its employees.

With kind regards,

Yours sincerely,

P.P.R.Upadhyaya             

*******************************************************************************************

Dear Sri.Sridharan,

I forgot to attach the Allahabad High court judgment dated 18.5.2016 with my earlier email. I now attach the judgment as desired.

With regards,

Yours sincerely,

P.P.R.Upadhyaya                                                           7.6.2016

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO READ ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT JUDGMENT ON

18.5.2016