A JOURNEY TOWARDS TRUTH, PEACE .

Dear shri Gopalakrishnan.,  Shri Sury has forwarded a copy sent by you of a circular issued by our Bangalore unit confirming that our fedn's counsels did not speak about extension of time at the last hearing on 8/12. It is timely and my compliments to all our activists at Bangalore. I have also posted a confirmation on this in RK Sahni's blog today. Besides I have also sent by post a long note under the caption 'year end musings' to m/s Ravindran 'TKS & Rajagopalan dealing with mischievous and wnwarranted writings by certain people on court proceedings.  I have requested shri Sury to carry it in his blog  tomorrow . Thanks again and with best wishes for a happy New Year -2017 Regds.- GNSridharan

FROM OUR VICE PRESIDENT OF  FEDERATION I wish you (& all your near & dear)  the Best of Prosperity and Happiness in the New Year 2017 M Arunnachalam

        More   3  of  29,634       e Circular Dt. 21/12/2016 Inbox x Sridharan G.N 8:52 AM (1 hour ago) to bcc:  me ​ R ​ e: Issues which are not sub-judice This is just to report that I had a detailed talk over phone yesterday (20/12) with the Dir(Per) Shri Sharad Srivastava on some of pending issues which are not under any litigation and could be decided by LIC itself without any Govt approval. In particular I referred to the following matters on which we have been repeatedly approaching the management for a very long time. 1. Re-fixation of pension for 92-93 retirees : I apprised the D(P) of the latest favourable trend in regard to a section of SBI pensioners facing similar problem and pointed out that there w...

Today in HC Delhi -  Argument commenced today. Further hearing is scheduled on  4th Jan 2017 . Details to follow.  GN Sridharan  Gen Secy Fed of Retired LIC Class I Officers' Assns

In Court 6: Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Chander Shekhar – On 8 th Dec 2016 25. W.P.(C) 184/2007 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC MR.RAJIV WITH W.P.(C) 5868/2016 CLAS K.GARG,P.GAUTAM,KAMAL W.P.(C) 4894/2016 Vs. UOI & ORS. MEHTA,ASHOK PANIGRAHI W.P.(C) 5903/2016 W.P.(C) 9440/2016 W.P.(C) 9441/2016 W.P.(C) 9442/2016 W.P.(C) 3983/2016 W.P.(C) 3984/2016 26. W.P.(C) 3983/2016 MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS A 26. W.P.(C) 3983/2016 MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS AS DIRECTED BY SUPREME Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS COURT,SAVLA AND ASSO 27. W.P.(C) 3984/2016 KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AS DIRECTED BY SUPREME Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS COURT,KUMAR GAURAV,R K SINGH,ABHINAV SHARMA 28. W.P.(C) 4894/2016 RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASTHA GAUR,ASHOK PANIGRAHI ASSOCIATION HYDERABAD Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR 29. W.P.(C) 5868/2016 ALL INDIA INSURANCE SOM DUTTA SHARMA PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 30. W.P.(C) 5903/2016 ALL INDIA RETIRED INSU...

MESSAGE FROM G N SRIDHARAN. OUR HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER MADAM J.  JAYALALITHAA IS NO MORE I am sorry  to report to our members the sad demise of  Ms. J Jayalalalithaa the chief minister of my home state of T N  last evening.. She was a courageous leader with a mass following. On behalf of our organisation, I extend our condolences to her followers and join them in their prayers for her soul to rest in peace. Due to  the tension following the intensive final stage treatment for her in the hospital commercial establishments were not functioning in the city to regular timings for the past couple of days. Besides I was also slightly indisposed after my return from Delhi on 30th ultimo with the result the finalisation of my report on the proceedings of the EC meeting held at Thrissur on 28/11 got delayed. I however hope to despatch the same in a couple of days.    GN Sridharan  Gen. Secy . Fedn of Retd  LIC Class1 of...

RAJYA SABHA LIVE on 1 DECEMBER 2015_PM_MODI_ANSWERING_OPPOSITION_ON_NOTEBAN

COPY OF LETTER DATED 18.11.2016 ADDRESSED TO CHAIRMAN LIC OF INDIA DEAR SIR, Ref: Health care schemes for pensioners....Domiciliary Medical expenses. We thankfully record at the outset that the existing medicalim scheme proiding cover against hospitalisation is no doubt of immense assistance for the LIC pensioners especially with the present features of premium-subsidy and proision for floater coer.  IT IS HOWEVER A MATTER OF REGRET THAT OUR REPEATED REQUEST FOR RELIEF AGAINST INCREASING DOMICILIARY MEDICAL EXPENSES HAVE NOT EVOKED ANY RESPONSE FROM THE CORPORATION TILL DATE. WE NEED NOT POINT OUT THAT PUBLIC VIEW INCREASINGLY INDICATE THAT EXCLUDING 'DOMICILIARY TREATMENT AS 'ANTI-CONSUMER' AND THERE HAE BEEN SHARP PUBLIC RESENTMENT, IF NOT CRITICISM, ON THE ATTITUDE OF GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANIES ON EXCLUSION OF COER, PARTICULARLY OF DOMICILIARY MEDICAL TREATMENT THOUGH THERE HAVE BEEN INSTANCES OF EXTENDING THE COVER FOR DOMICILIARY EXPENSES IN THE RECENT PAST...