Re: Case before Delhi High Court
Though we were aware of the high expectations of pensioners on the outcome of the impending hearing on the 29 th we could not send out any communication for the past couple of weeks for valid reasons.
We were busy concentrating on preparing our written responses on the stand of LIC in the Delhi HC on our amended writ.
We may inform that we could finalise in time the following materials.-
1) Rejoinder to LIC's Reply to our amended WP 184/2007
2) Reply affidavit to the 'compliance' affidavit of LIC in regard to payment of Interim Relief as per SC order filed by them in WP 3984/2016.
1) Rejoinder to LIC's Reply to our amended WP 184/2007
2) Reply affidavit to the 'compliance' affidavit of LIC in regard to payment of Interim Relief as per SC order filed by them in WP 3984/2016.
The finalisation of the above called for intense consultations amongst our Legal committee members and everyone contributed to make it a good teamwork M/s R Rajagopalan and Basudeb Das provided valuable inputs.
Shri M Arunachalam bore the brunt of giving a final shape to our efforts maintaining contact with me continuously. Shri VK Jain maintained excellent liaison with our counsel with the able assistance of our petitioner shri.Amritlal. I sincerely thank every one of them.
While we were deeply involved in our work as above one "leader' chose to comment in one of his communications that our Federation's ' reservations' in attacking LIC were due to our 'inability' and 'unwillingness'.
We need no certificate from others who really believe in and bring about in disunity. We however expect that it may not be easy for LIC to counter the points made out by us in the rejoinder and affidavit referred to above.
Kindly await our next communication on 29th in regard to the court proceedings
With Greetings -
GNSridharan
GNSridharan
Comments
Post a Comment
Your opinions are of interest to us.
We shall be only too receptive when you respond. BTW, comments are subject to moderation.