A JOURNEY TOWARDS TRUTH, PEACE .

Day’s happening in Delhi HC We sent a couple of SMS to a few and the detailed account follows as below. Our case was listed in both Court No 6 and a Special Court. As soon as the Bench sat in the morning at  10.30 AM , our Advocate Shri Rajiv Garg and a senior counsel of one other petitioner mentioned this to Bench and sought indication as to when our case would be heard during the day. This was necessary since it was expected that a reconstituted Bench may be hearing our case as the companion judge J Sunita Gupta is reportedly retiring very shortly. Further the general view among counsels was that hearing on our matters will have to be taken up on a day-to-day basis over a short span, once a final date is fixed. In the entire morning session and also more than 1 and ½ hours after lunch break, only other listed cases were taken up by J Sanjiv Khanna and a new companion Judge.  At close to 3 45 PM, the existing Bench retired and the erstwhile Bench hearing our case took up th

RBI/2016-17/140 DPSS.CO.PD.No.1280/02.14.003/ 2016-17 November 18, 2016 The Chairman and Managing Director / Chief Executive Officers All Scheduled Commercial Banks including RRBs / Urban Co-operative Banks / State Co-operative Banks / District Central Co-operative Banks / All Card Network Providers Dear Madam / Sir, Cash Withdrawal at Point-of-Sale (POS) - Withdrawal limits and customer fee/charges - Relaxation A reference is invited to our circulars DPSS.CO.PD.No.147/ 02.14.003/2009-10 dated July 22, 2009,  DPSS.CO.PD.No.563/02.14. 003/2013-14 dated September 5, 2013  and  DPSS.CO.PD.No.449/02. 14.003/2015-16 dated August 27, 2015  on cash withdrawal at Point of Sale (POS) enabled for all debit cards/open loop prepaid cards issued by banks with specified per day value limits for different locations. 2. Following the withdrawal of legal tender characteristics of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes (Specified Bank Notes – SBN), the Reserve Bank of India had advise

A communication from  G N SRIDHARAN. ON THE RECENT HAPPENINGS.  Dear shri Sury,  your mails one re: shri Asthana's post on Mr Sreenivasamurthy and the other on Delhi HC order of 11/11. Kindly bear with me for having delayed my response.  While I felt that shri KMLA's post was a trifle harsh in language I should be honest in stating that I am in full agreement with the message that he has sought to convey Viz. Mr. murthy is anxious to see that LIC pensioners recognise him as the only leader working for their good. His anxiety is understandable and it is the natural for those who choose themselves as leaders. Mr. murthy broke away from our organisation as he was not happy that we were pursuing the issue of DR anomaly affecting the aged pre 97 lot and he would not settle for anything other than up gradation for all and nothing else. He was not receptive to our plea that upgradation was not thought of when we approached Delhi HC in late 2006 and our petition was numbe