A JOURNEY TOWARDS TRUTH, PEACE .

  Delhi High court order of date  We have just been informed that orders were pronounced by Justice Khanna of Delhi HC holding that the supreme court order on payment of 40% IR has been complied with by LIC. It is indeed a disappointing situation for the pensioners. Some of us knowing the trend of thinking of judiciary on such matters have always cautioned against any over reliance on judiciary to solve all our problems . This interim pronouncement on an issue blown out of proportion by self seeking 'Leaders' will unfortunately have repercussions on other issues still to be gone into by the High court.  It is distressing one of such leaders has already started talking of going to supreme court.      We appeal to all members to re ​m​ember that only on our initiative that the   IR arose and we are as competant as others it not more than others in   tackling such depressing situations, after we receive the copy of the order shortly.  Meantime we hope that our members

DELHI HIGH COURT HOLDS  THAT THE SUPREME COURT ORDER HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH BY LIC.  AWAIT DETAILED CIRCULAR LATE IN THE EVENING. FROM G.N.SRIDHARAN.

11.11.2016 J-1 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT (APPLT. JURISDICTION) COURT NO.6  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA AT 2.15 P.M. 1. W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN VS. KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT & ORS. BHADURI, KUMAR GAURAV 2. W.P.(C) 9441/2016 KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS KUMAR GAURAV VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN INDIA & ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI,SURAJIT BHADURI 3. W.P.(C) 9442/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN & ORS.VS. KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT ASTHANA & ANR. BHADURI, KUMAR GAURAV 4. W.P.(C) 184/2007 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC CLASS I TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN OFFICER VS. UOI & ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT BHADURI, ABHA MALHOTRA 5. W.P.(C) 3983/2016 MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS RENUKA SAHU, ABHA MALHOTRA VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS TUSHAR

11.11.2016 J-1 FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT (APPLT. JURISDICTION) COURT NO.6 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA AT 2.15 P.M. 1. W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN VS. KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT & ORS. BHADURI, KUMAR GAURAV 2. W.P.(C) 9441/2016 KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS KUMAR GAURAV VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN INDIA & ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI,SURAJIT BHADURI 3. W.P.(C) 9442/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN & ORS.VS. KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT ASTHANA & ANR. BHADURI, KUMAR GAURAV 4. W.P.(C) 184/2007 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICER VS. UOI & ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI, SURAJIT BHADURI, ABHA MALHOTRA  TUSHAR MEHTA, DAYAN KRISHNAN  5. W.P.(C) 3983/2016 MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS RENUKA SAHU, ABHA MALHOTRA VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS TUSHAR MEHTA,

TODAY U AND I HAVE NO OTHER GO EXCEPT TO SIT AT HOME AND WATCH THE TV. RELAX AND ENJOY THE DANCE PROGRAMME.  LIVE

Pension matters One view based on long experience is that nothing dramatic may happen, through judiciary or otherwise, on our pending genuine problems unless and until parallel situations affecting Bank pensioners are finally dealt with by IBA/GOI, .one way or the other. We are therefore naturally keeping in touch with friends in the banking sector who are fighting for justice to their pensioners. The one identical problem is the denial of 100% neutralization on DR, the only difference being the date on which the discrimination arose.  Also, the issue affecting the pensioners of SBI alone calls for our close watch. In SBI those who retired after the seventh bipartite settlement was effected still receive their pensions based on the earlier 6th bipartite settlement. This is something similar to the case of retired of the period 1/8/92 to 1/4/93 for whom the judiciary has already handed down a verdict favourable to the pensioners in MC Jain's case. The writ petitions bot